Ephedra:
Another View
By Jerry McLaughlin, Ph.D., Vice President
R&D/QA/Chief Scientific Officer
Dr. Jerry McLaughlin presented this paper in an Open
Meeting of the U.S. Public Health Service in Washington
D.C. on Aug. 89, 2000. Previous to the meeting there was a
call for testimony. Speakers volunteered to present their
views and findings on ephedra. An estimated 500 people
from both sides of the ephedra lobby were in attendance.
Its important for our Managers and Distributors to
realize that NSP is making a presence in Washington,
trying to defend our industry against those in the media
and otherwise who would tear it down, Jerry said. Several
other trade organizations, vendors and individual
consumers were present, lending credence to the
beneficial, even life-changing, effects of ephedra.

Ephedra products contain a mixture of
phenylpropanolamine alkaloids called ephedrines. These
compounds, composed primarily of ephedrine itself, promote
the release of norepinephrine from sympathetic nerve
endings. They induce a number of pharmacologic responses,
including vasoconstriction, hypertension, nausea,
vomiting, increased heart rate, bronchial relaxation,
urinary retention, nervous stimulation and anorexia (loss
of appetite).1
Two of these effects, bronchial dilation in asthma and
anorexia for weight loss, have current practical
applications, but the other actions must be remembered as
potential undesirable side effects. Consumers of ephedra
products have experienced rare cardiac (heart attack) and
circulation (stroke) problems, but the FDA consultant
physicians, upon evaluation of 1,133 reported adverse
effect reports (AERs) over the past 10 years, have
concluded that these adversely affected consumers had
pre-existing conditions that were exacerbated by the
vascular and cardiac side effects of ephedra.2
The incidences of such adverse effects are extremely rare
(nine associated deaths in the past 10 years) considering
that over 3 billion doses of ephedra are con-sumed per
year for weight loss.
Natures Sunshine Products sells over 500 different
natural supplements with gross sales approaching $300
million per year. Ten of these are weight-loss products,
which contain herbal ephedra mixed with other ingredients.
In 1998, 629,430 units of these products, representing
about 28,324,350 doses, were sold. Our Customer Service
department logs over 360,000 inquiries per year, and in
the first six months of this year only eight complaints
were received regarding our ephedra products. Of these
eight, only four (complaining of nausea and vomit-ing,
nervousness, water retention and heart palpitations) were
attributable to ephedra.
We have a team in our Research and Development
department that handles technical inquiries; this group
fields about 500 questions per month, and, in the past one
and one-half years, they have logged nine complaints
attributable to ephedra; five of these concerned heart
palpitations.
From early 1993 to October 1998, the FDAs special
nutritionals adverse effect monitoring system (SN/AEMS)
tabulated 11 AERs for Natures Sunshine ephedra products.
These effects included hypertension (2), headache (3),
nausea (1), nervousness (3) and heart palpitations (2).
Considering the millions of doses consumed, it can be
concluded that the number of adverse effects due to the
use of our products is trivial, and no deaths have been
associated with this use.
We believe that this good safety record can be
attributed to several factors: 1) our products contain
ephedrines exactly as labeled;3 2) our labels
explicitly inform our consumers of potential cautions; 3)
caffeine and other stimulants, which might adversely
synergize with the ephedrines, are not included; and 4)
our policy of people helping people provides wise counsel
and advice, along with product, to our consumers.
In view of the sensationalism created by the FDA and
the media over the purported side effects, the beneficial
effects of ephedra, as an aid to weight loss, are being
unjustly ignored. Of the 2,300,000 total deaths recorded
in 1997 in the U.S., some 955,021 (42 percent) were
attributed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to
conditions that typically emanate from obesity (heart
disease, hypertension, stroke and diabetes). According to
CDC statistics, some 54 percent of the adults in the U.S.
are overweight, and the mortality due to obesity is
certainly a greater danger than the rare incidences of
stroke or heart attacks attributed to temporary
consumption of ephedra products. Thus, ephedra products
for weight control clearly offer a favorable ratio of
benefit to risk, and that ratio is equivalent or superior
to anything else that is available to the U.S. consumer as
an anorexiant (appetite suppressant). The drug abuse
potential of the amphetamines like dexedrine and the
pul-monary hypertension and damage to heart valves induced
by fen-phen serve as examples of the dan-gers of
anorexiant products offered by the pharmaceutical industry
and blessed by FDA approval. The overall incidence of
serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is 6.7 per-cent and
that of fatal ADRs is 0.32 per-cent of hospitalized
patients.4 Such syn-thetic products are major
culprits in killing 106,000 hospitalized patients per year
by adverse drug effects. Such facts give the U.S. consumer
little confidence in the FDA seal of approval, and the
DSHEA law of 1994 pro-vides us all with a safer
alternative in the form of natural dietary/nutritional
supplements which can be chosen directly by the consumer
without the inconvenience, expense, and risk of consulting
physicians and buying prescriptions.
To put into proper perspective the relative importance
of adverse effects, we remind the media and the FDA of the
inherent dangers of a common OTC drug such as
acetaminophen, the pain reliever found in TylenolŪ.
Overdoses of acetaminophen quickly deplete the liver of
glutathione and necessitate the administration of
antidotal acetylcysteine. The American Association of
Poison Control Centers in 1998 recorded 111,454 reports of
such overdoses with 153 resultant deaths. Accurate
statistics are not available regarding the number of
acetaminiphen doses consumed per year, but it can be
estimated at about 6 billion compared to about 3 billion
doses of ephedra prducts used for weight loss.
Since headaches and mild pain are not real threats to
human life (and obesity is), one could question why such a
dangerous product as acetaminophen is tolerated and why
ephedra products, which pose far less of a health threat,
are under the current scrutiny. Might the answer lie in a
combination of zealousness on the part of the FDA in their
quest to encumber herbal products with bureaucratic
over-regulations and in a press and news media that finds
it necessary to feed something sensational every day to
the consuming public whether it is real, exaggerated or
concocted?
1 Robbers and Tyler, Tylers Herbs of Choice,
Haworth Press, N.Y., 1999, p. 114.
2 The Tan Sheet, April 17, 2000, p. 89.
3 Gurley et al., Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm.,
57, 963969, 2000.
4 Lazarou et al., JAMA, 279, 12001205, 1998.
|